Trusting Russian Root Certificates and Monitoring Domestic CT Logs
The discussion around trust in Russian root certificates issued by the Ministry of Digital Development and Communications has intensified following recent issues with GOST certificates on Gosuslugi. Users are weighing the security implications of adding these roots to system stores, browser profiles, or relying on Yandex Browser where they are pre-installed.
Root certificates themselves do not compromise systems, yet placing them in trusted stores creates a pathway for traffic interception. Entities with access to network flows via the TSPU system can issue intermediate certificates signed by the Russian root and perform real-time MitM attacks against sites such as gmail.com or telegram.org.
Defensive measures remain limited. One approach involves isolating the Russian roots to a dedicated browser profile used only for domestic sites that require them. Advanced configurations can further restrict the roots to specific domains such as *.ru.
Certificate Transparency as a Mitigation
Certificate Transparency logs record every issued certificate in an append-only structure, embedding proof of inclusion inside the certificate. Yandex Browser refuses certificates lacking a valid SCT from approved logs, significantly raising the bar for undetected MitM operations and leaving forensic traces.
Other browsers automatically disable CT verification for chains anchored to manually added roots, treating them as corporate environments. This behavior reduces visibility into potential abuse of Russian intermediates.
Domestic CT Logs
Three primary logs are recognized by Yandex:
- Yandex Agate Log (2026 and 2027 instances)
- VK NCA Log (2026 and 2027 instances)
- Ministry of Digital Development and Communications Log (2026 and 2027 instances)
Log endpoints rotate yearly, and the authoritative list is published at browser-resources.s3.yandex.net/ctlog/ctlog.json.
Verification Tools
Public monitors such as ct.tlscc.ru have shown gaps in coverage for newer log addresses and certain active certificates. A Python utility was developed to fetch the current log list, parse embedded SCTs, reconstruct precertificates, and query each domestic log via the standard CT HTTP API for inclusion proofs.
Related articles
Protecting Data Centers from Kinetic and Cyber Attacks: What Regulators Worldwide Are Proposing
InfoWatch experts have updated their April report on data center resilience, highlighting how physical and cyber threats now directly threaten business continuity and national security. Regulators in the United States, European Union, and Russia are treating data centers as strategic infrastructure requiring layered defenses that combine physical hardening, geographic distribution, and strict cybersecurity controls. The United States has launched the Cyberstrategy for America 2026 emphasizing offensive operations, Zero Trust modernization, and supply-chain restrictions. The European Union is implementing ProtectEU and the Cyber Solidarity Act with real-time threat sharing and mandatory resilience standards under DORA. Russia is advancing technological sovereignty targets, new siting rules for data centers, and Presidential Decree No. 604 that enables temporary state management of inadequately protected critical facilities. The report also notes growing recognition that attacks on data centers can constitute acts of aggression under the Tallinn Manual.
US Department of Homeland Security Orders Federal Agencies to Remove DeepSeek Products
The US Department of Homeland Security issued an order on October 19 requiring federal civilian agencies to cease purchasing products from DeepSeek and to remove related technology from government systems. The directive, published the following day, targets Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence, its affiliates, and any third-party products or services built on DeepSeek implementations. The measure stems from the Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act of 2018 and follows a recommendation by the Federal Acquisition Security Council, though no specific incidents or evidence were detailed in the notice. The restriction applies only to federal environments and does not prohibit private sector or individual use outside government systems. No removal deadline was set, and the document does not name the signing authority. The order is filed under docket DHS-2026-0628 with the CISA implementation team listed as the contact point.
AKIT Requests Temporary Permission for Russian Companies to Transfer Personal Data Abroad After Data Center Incidents
The Association of Internet Trade Companies (AKIT) has sent a formal letter to Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin proposing a temporary exemption from strict data localization rules. The measure would allow affected companies to move critical systems and Russian citizens' personal data to data centers in friendly countries when domestic infrastructure is unavailable due to accidents or damage. Members including Ozon, Wildberries, Cooper, and Yandex Market argue that services must continue operating even if Russian facilities are compromised. The proposed special regime would apply only after an officially confirmed incident, require compliance with information security standards, and end no later than March 1, 2028. After recovery, companies would be required to return to normal data processing within Russia. Expert Alexey Muntyan noted that the mechanism activates only after incidents occur and questioned whether countries should be selected based on data protection levels rather than political alignment.
Anthropic Model Reconstructs NSA Seeds for NIST Elliptic Curves in Under 30 Minutes
An internal Anthropic research model traced the origins of the five seeds used by the NSA to generate the NIST elliptic curves P-192, P-224, P-256, P-384, and P-521. The discovery resolves a 25-year-old question that arose when the curves were standardized in FIPS 186-2 for ECDSA in 2000. Researchers combined analysis of 1990s random number generators, 34 generator-output combinations, and lattice reduction techniques to identify lrand48 initialized with Unix timestamps from May 1997 to April 1998. The P-256 seed corresponds to the 1842nd candidate from a run started on 16 August 1997, and example seeds from ANSI X9.62 follow the same pattern. The work does not demonstrate any cryptographic break or backdoor in the curves and does not recommend changes to production systems. Several questions remain open, including the seed for curve B-163 and the reason certain candidate values were discarded.