Habr•August 19, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

YooMoney's YuScan Automates E-commerce Risk Assessment Scanning Up to 1,000 Sites Per Hour

YooMoney has published a detailed technical overview of YuScan, its internal service for automated risk assessment of e-commerce websites. The tool helps banks and payment organizations detect merchants that attempt to mask prohibited or high-risk activities behind seemingly legitimate storefronts.

Since its launch in 2020, YuScan has analyzed more than 550,000 merchant applications. During this period YooKassa has not received any regulatory fines related to servicing prohibited business activities.

The service is intended for organizations that process over 10,000 pages daily, work with acquiring, marketplaces, KYC/AML checks, or must comply with Russian Federal Law 152-FZ. Manual analysis of such volumes quickly becomes a bottleneck, so YuScan was developed to perform deep, automated audits at scale.

From URL to Report in Minutes

YuScan starts from a merchant’s homepage and recursively crawls the entire site structure. It behaves like a real browser by executing JavaScript, waiting for dynamic elements, and scrolling through pages. This approach reveals content that would remain hidden under simple HTTP requests.

Asynchronous processing allows the system to handle up to 1,000 sites per hour. For modern sites that rely heavily on JavaScript, the crawler uses the Playwright library. When standard automation is blocked by advanced anti-bot systems such as Cloudflare, YuScan switches to Camoufox, which modifies browser behavior at the C/C++ level to produce cleaner fingerprints and avoid detection.

Technology Stack and Architecture

The service is written in Python. The API layer is built with FastAPI, data is stored in PostgreSQL, and the crawling core is based on the open-source Scrapy framework. Playwright handles browser automation while custom scaling and risk-scoring logic sit on top of Scrapy’s queue and pipeline system.

After data collection, multiple analysis stages begin. Text, images, reviews, external links, and registration details are examined. Images are converted into vector embeddings and compared against sensitive categories such as alcohol, tobacco, and online gambling. Large language models evaluate context to reduce false positives.

External Signals and Final Scoring

YuScan also checks whether a domain appears in Roskomnadzor registries, reviews third-party feedback, analyzes WHOIS records, and looks for signs of cloned or fraudulent sites. Extracted company details (INN, KPP, OGRN, contacts, and legal documents) help distinguish real businesses from temporary or opaque operations.

Since the introduction of automated checks, merchant onboarding times have improved significantly: simple cases are completed in under three hours, half of all companies begin processing payments within one day, and seven out of ten finish the process within two days.

Related articles

Habr•Fraud & Social Engineering

Aroshka Cloud Faces Scrutiny Over Alleged False Claims of SOC 24/7 Operations and High-End Infrastructure

StackWorks has published the fourth installment in its investigative series on Aroshka Cloud, detailing how the cloud storage provider accused the studio of orchestrating a DDoS attack shortly after the third part appeared. The service published five posts claiming technical evidence linked StackWorks to the attack, including IP traces from Moscow, Ufa, and Stavropol, while asserting that its SOC 24/7 team mitigated a 3.5 Gbit/s assault within seconds. StackWorks responded with a pre-trial claim demanding removal of the posts and a public retraction, which Aroshka Cloud rejected within seven minutes. Analysis of the provider’s own Kwork job postings reveals requests for template-based support staff, a five-VDS server pool, and later up to eight NVIDIA H200 GPUs with InfiniBand, contradicting public statements about multi-country data centers and round-the-clock security engineers. Further inconsistencies include mismatched time zones in email headers, inflated user statistics, and reliance on the BeDrive script rather than custom development. The investigation continues with plans to involve law enforcement regarding suspicious visitor logs.

Habr•Fraud & Social Engineering

Reports Surface on Alleged De-Anonymization of Admins Running Major Russian Hacker Forums

An independent researcher has compiled publicly available information pointing to the possible identities of administrators behind prominent Russian-language darknet forums including exploit.in and duty-free.to. The analysis traces exploit.in back to its 2006 launch by a user known as Toha, later linked to Ukrainian authorities or associates, with the forum reportedly transferred or sold. Forum moderator Quake3, identified in open sources as Anatoly Kravchuk, ceased activity in October 2026 and appears on a German police wanted list. Additional details from forum posts and anonymous Telegram channels name Mikhail Rytikov, known as Abdulla, as a key figure tied to server hosting and operations. The report also notes the recent involvement of known Russian hacker wazawaka on duty-free.to and highlights the declining viability of several legacy forums due to law enforcement actions. All claims are presented as unverified public speculation without new original sourcing.

AntiMalware•Fraud & Social Engineering

Google Strengthens Chrome Defenses Against ClickFix Clipboard-Based Scams

Google has updated Chrome to detect and warn users about malicious commands copied to the clipboard as part of ClickFix attacks. These scams trick users into pasting harmful scripts into system tools such as PowerShell under the guise of fixing errors or providing tech support. The new protections activate when Enhanced Protection in Safe Browsing is enabled and send suspicious commands for analysis after removing personal data. Google has also shifted scam page detection from a local Gemini model to a server-side implementation to improve accuracy against fake tech support, antivirus, and browser update sites. The changes make it harder for attackers to bypass browser download checks by abusing clipboard and system console execution. Official details were published in the Google Security Blog.

Habr•Fraud & Social Engineering

SPF, DKIM and DMARC: Practical Guide to Detecting Email Spoofing and Phishing

The article explains how email authentication mechanisms SPF, DKIM, and DMARC work together to combat spoofed messages that impersonate trusted services. It provides concrete DNS record examples and shows how to interpret Authentication-Results headers in received emails. SPF verifies authorized sending IP addresses but does not check the visible From address. DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to message content and headers, while DMARC ties these checks to the sender domain visible to users and defines handling policies. The guide also covers common configuration errors, forwarding issues, and why successful authentication does not guarantee message safety. It concludes that these protocols must be combined with additional security measures such as attachment scanning and user awareness training.