360 Launches nanoWork Enterprise Edition Channel Ecosystem with Native Security for AI Agents
On August 17, the 360 nanoWork Enterprise Edition partner recruitment launch event successfully convened, bringing together more than 200 channel partners from across China in a virtual gathering. This marked the first major assembly of channel partners since the product’s official release on July 28.
360 Group founder Zhou Hongyi stated at the event: “AI is moving from ‘being able to answer questions’ to ‘being able to complete tasks.’” The recruitment launch represents the critical step in turning this vision into reality by ensuring AI can truly “do work and deliver results,” supported by a security foundation, channel network, and service system.
360 Commercial Comprehensive Channel Department General Manager Wang Yi noted that the ToB enterprise digitalization sector is undergoing a definitive iteration, with AI agents replacing traditional office software as the next-generation productivity tool. The industry has shifted from conceptual observation to commercial deployment. Despite the trillion-dollar blue ocean opening, enterprise AI implementation remains challenging, with AI agent penetration in business operations at only about 18% and over 70% of AI projects failing to reach production environments.
Security as the Foundation
Wang Yi explained that 360 leverages more than 20 years of security accumulation to position nanoWork Enterprise Edition as a truly deployable enterprise-grade AI agent platform that improves efficiency and is easy for channels to sell and deliver. The product features “native security, built-in from the factory,” embedding 360’s two-decade security expertise and national-level cyber defense capabilities through mechanisms such as cloud isolation, permission control, and data protection. This allows enterprises to confidently assign real work to AI by controlling what the AI can see, do, and share results with.
Channel Architecture and Revenue Models
The company released its latest channel policy featuring a three-dimensional partner architecture, four profit models, and a five-tier empowerment system. The three-dimensional framework uses “classification × layering × grading”: classification divides partners into regional, industry, ecosystem strategic, and scenario co-construction categories; layering distinguishes between agency and joint-operation models; grading certifies core, key, and potential tiers with increasing benefits. Four core revenue paths cover account expansion, compute consumption, training services, and陪跑 delivery. The five empowerment systems provide training, certification, content, tools, and sales support through online live sessions, on-site training, certification bootcamps, dedicated learning platforms, and real-time sales assistance groups.
Service and FDE Network
Service remains central, supported by a 1,000+ frontline deployment engineer (FDE) legion and the AikerWorld community. FDEs, drawn from 360’s “white hat” teams, deliver six service modules including AI consultation, product training, customization, deep development, cloud陪跑, and on-site驻场 support. Two delivery modes are offered: an陪跑 mode bundled with product seats for guided adoption and standalone service packages for deeper implementation. The AikerWorld community connects AI developers, industry experts, and partners with PMI China’s 680,000 certified project managers to scale the expert network nationwide.
Through city-level channel partners, 360 combines headquarters capabilities with localized service to bring enterprise AI into real business scenarios across enterprises, stores, and industrial parks.
Related articles
TenetBench Benchmark Tests LLMs for Compliance with Professional Ethical Codes
Researchers from the Institute of Information Security Issues at ISP RAS and the Institute of Cybersecurity and Information Protection at RANEPA have developed TenetBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate how well large language models adhere to specific norms in professional codes of ethics. The benchmark generates realistic work-related prompts that may conflict with rules from documents such as the Code of Professional Ethics for Advocates or journalistic standards on undisclosed advertising. Each test case pairs a conflicting request with a neutral counterpart to measure whether models refuse, warn, or still provide prohibited content. Evaluation separates task completion, norm violation detection, and presence of explicit refusals using an LLM-as-a-Judge approach validated against human annotators. The full dataset contains 3,433 prompt pairs derived from 15 professional codes, with a public subset of 2,235 pairs from 10 documents. Human validation confirmed 99.5% of generated examples as fully plausible work scenarios.
Solar to Showcase Solar AI Firewall for Business Protection Against AI Risks at SOC Forum 2026
GK Solar will present its new Solar AI Firewall solution at SOC Forum 2026 to help organizations control interactions with AI services and prevent confidential data leaks through employee prompts. The product addresses growing risks from staff sending corporate data to neural networks and AI agents gaining access to internal systems. The forum takes place on 27-28 October in Moscow's Lomonosov cluster, with the official launch of Solar AI Firewall scheduled during the event. Solar will also highlight practical risks of AI adoption, including data transmission to external services, use of public models by employees, and new attack surfaces in corporate infrastructure. The solution will be demonstrated as part of an integrated ecosystem for access, network, and data protection. In addition, the company plans to introduce JSOC ONE, a new line of Solar JSOC services tailored for mid-sized businesses that require 24/7 monitoring without building their own SOC.
Researcher Runs 100 Abliterated AI Agents Against His Own Accounts, Achieves Five Successful Breaches
A security researcher deployed roughly 100 autonomous AI agents based on abliterated open-source models to attempt unauthorized access to his online accounts over a five-hour period. The agents successfully compromised three accounts by exploiting vulnerabilities in legacy personal projects and two additional accounts through password reuse and credential stuffing. They also conducted 16 social engineering attempts, harvested and cross-verified personal data from public sources, and generated phishing pages targeting the researcher's Substack and Hacker News presence. Despite these successes, the agents failed to discover any zero-day vulnerabilities in third-party software or gain access to Tier-0 accounts such as Gmail, 1Password, or banking services. The experiment relied on abliterated versions of GLM-5.3 and DeepSeek V4 Flash models running on cloud GPUs, orchestrated via Codex CLI inside Docker containers with access to Railway infrastructure. Total compute cost reached approximately $210, equating to roughly $40 per successful account compromise. The researcher concluded that inexpensive swarms of such agents could soon enable low-skill attackers to systematically map and exploit an individual's entire online footprint.
How Censorship in Closed AI Models Reshapes Science: Hugging Face Releases Open Carbon-X DNA Model
Hugging Face CEO Clement Delangue announced the release of Carbon-X, an open 14.8 billion parameter language model designed for reading, analyzing, and generating DNA sequences. The announcement highlighted how shallow guardrails in closed commercial models blocked even proofreading a tweet discussing the topic. Commenters and researchers pointed out that these input/output filters lack context awareness, blocking legitimate scientific queries while motivated adversaries bypass them through rephrasing. Carbon-X was built on Qwen3-14B with a hybrid BPE and 6-mer tokenizer, domain mid-training on 302 billion tokens, and safety achieved through data curation rather than runtime censorship. The model achieves performance comparable to closed frontier systems at roughly 1/1800th the inference cost for large-scale genomic tasks. The case underscores growing asymmetry between closed corporate AI labs building wet labs and independent researchers restricted by superficial safety layers.