Building a Minimal Open Source Security Stack for Infrastructure Protection
Full protection of corporate infrastructure today is difficult to achieve without commercial security tools. However, startups, small organizations, and budget-constrained companies often turn to open source solutions as a compromise. This guide focuses on building a minimal security stack that addresses core information security tasks using freely available tools.
A basic stack must cover several key areas: protection of endpoints to detect malware and workstation compromise, network perimeter defense and traffic control, centralized collection and analysis of security events, and user access management through proper authentication and rights separation. The recommendations are intended as a starting point for small infrastructures rather than a complete substitute for enterprise products.
Antivirus Protection
ClamAV is one of the best-known open source antivirus engines with cross-platform support for Linux, Windows, and macOS. On Windows, the graphical frontend ClamWin is available. It is frequently used to scan mail traffic and file repositories in addition to endpoint protection. Other options include the OpenAntiVirus Project and KicomAV.
Installation on Linux uses the commands: apt-get update followed by apt-get install clamav clamav-daemon. Services clamav-freshclam and clamav-daemon handle signature updates and scanning. On Windows, the standard installer is used, and recursive scans are performed with clamscan --recursive.
Network Perimeter Protection
Popular open source firewalls include pfSense, built on FreeBSD with the PF packet filter, its fork OPNsense, and the proxy server Squid. pfSense supports installation of Snort and Suricata for intrusion detection and prevention, as well as Squid for web traffic filtering. Key features encompass multi-WAN load balancing, VPN servers (IPsec, OpenVPN, L2TP, TINC), DHCP services, HAProxy publishing, captive portal support, and log forwarding to external SIEM systems.
Rules for Snort or Suricata can be loaded from ET Open or official VRT feeds. The system can operate in IDS mode for logging only or IPS mode for active blocking. Logs are forwarded via the Status → System Log → Settings section.
Security Event Collection and Analysis
The ELK Stack (Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana) enables custom SIEM construction. Logstash and Ingest Pipelines normalize events, while threshold and EQL rules support correlation of authentication failures or suspicious sequences. Wazuh offers a more integrated platform with built-in vulnerability scanning, file integrity monitoring, EDR-like capabilities, and direct mapping to the MITRE ATT&CK framework for threat hunting and IOC enrichment.
Access Management and Authentication
Keycloak provides single sign-on using OAuth2, OIDC, and SAML standards. It authenticates users, issues JWT tokens, and supports integration with LDAP or Telegram. Configuration involves creating an OpenID Connect client, setting valid redirect URIs, and mapping roles in the target application such as Kibana.
These open source components together form a functional baseline for small environments, but they must be tuned to the specific infrastructure, kept updated, and sourced only from active, reputable projects.
Related articles
PT AF Cloud Uses Machine Learning to Detect Shifts in Web Attack Patterns from Millions of WAF Events
Positive Technologies has detailed how its PT AF Cloud service applies anomaly detection to WAF events, turning tens of millions of daily security events into actionable weekly alerts for SOC teams. The system builds traffic profiles based on the distribution of triggered protection rules for each tenant and compares current hourly or daily profiles against a weighted historical baseline using Jensen-Shannon distance. This approach identifies meaningful changes in attack composition even when overall event volume remains stable, catching the start of scans, exploitation of newly published vulnerabilities, or post-release application changes that trigger new rules. Two detection modes operate in parallel: an hourly mode for rapid spikes and a daily mode for gradual shifts distributed across multiple hours. Alerts include comparative tables of top rules, unique attack vectors, and direct links to the relevant events in the PT AF interface. Over four weeks the detector surfaced roughly 1,100 anomalies across the cloud, with expert review confirming that 69 percent indicated either an attack or a protection misconfiguration.
How to Prepare Your Website for Data Center Outages: Business Resilience Checklist
Following strikes on Yandex data centers, many businesses discovered that their sites and all backups were stored in a single location, leading to complete outages. The article provides a detailed checklist to mitigate such risks by separating critical components across different providers. Key recommendations include moving DNS to an independent provider, lowering TTL values, maintaining a live mirror site on separate hosting, and isolating corporate email. Additional steps cover local backups, monitoring, access management, and CDN usage. The guidance differentiates between virtual hosting, VPS or dedicated servers, and website builders like Tilda, while emphasizing compliance with Russian data localization laws such as 152-FZ.
How to Properly Compare CDNs: TTFB, p95 Latency, Caching, DDoS Protection and True Pricing
Selecting a CDN based solely on the number of points of presence is as unreliable as choosing a car by dashboard buttons. Networks with dozens of global PoPs may underperform for audiences concentrated in Novosibirsk or Yekaterinburg, while smaller regional providers often deliver superior peering with Russian operators. The article evaluates CDNVideo, EdgeCenter, Curator, NGENIX and Yandex Cloud CDN across verifiable features, network design, caching behavior, security controls, operations and commercial models. Performance data is separated because marketing claims cannot substitute for independent measurements from services such as CDNMON. Emphasis is placed on p95 metrics, cache hit ratios, origin shielding, raw logs and API limits rather than marketing scores. The analysis shows that no single universal ranking exists; optimal choice depends on traffic profile, audience geography, security requirements and operational workflows.
Innostage Lab Benchmarks PT NGFW 1.10.3 Performance in Eight Load Scenarios
Innostage researchers conducted extensive performance testing of PT NGFW version 1.10.3, the certified release at the time of trials. The evaluation covered TCP connection setup rates, concurrent session capacity, and throughput on a custom EMIX traffic profile with varying security modules enabled. Tests used Cisco TRex generators and a high-rule-count policy of 100,000 entries to simulate realistic enterprise conditions. Results showed the device sustaining 700,000 CPS and 6.4 million concurrent connections, matching or approaching vendor claims under HA-cluster configuration. Throughput remained above 27 Gbps even with IPS, application control, antivirus, NAT, URL filtering, and logging active. The report highlights differences in test methodology compared with vendor figures, including packet sizes and clustering setup.