Astra Cloud Launches Attested Secure Cloud to Accelerate FSTEC Compliance for Russian Government Systems
Astra Cloud, a division of the Astra Group, has launched a new "Protected Attested Cloud" platform intended for the deployment of state information systems, ISPDn, medical platforms, and other environments handling sensitive data.
The infrastructure has successfully passed attestation according to FSTEC Russia Order No. 117, achieving protection class K1, and Order No. 21, reaching protection level UZ-1. Clients can now use this pre-certified environment when attesting their own contours, which the company estimates will accelerate the overall procedure by three to five times.
Although the service removes the need to build infrastructure components from scratch, each customer's information system must still undergo its own attestation process. The offering includes a full set of certified protection tools such as firewalls, antivirus software, intrusion detection and prevention systems, trusted boot facilities, and SIEM solutions.
Access to the cloud is permitted exclusively through protected channels based on certified cryptographic information protection tools. The entire infrastructure resides in a Tier IV data center constructed using domestic hardware.
The solution targets organizations required to comply with FSTEC Russia regulations but unwilling to construct their own protected data centers, purchase separate security products, or expand their information security teams.
Starting 1 March 2026, Order No. 117 replaces Order No. 17 and extends its requirements beyond state bodies to subordinate institutions and companies interacting with the state segment. Critical vulnerabilities must now be remediated within 24 hours, and protection metrics must be reviewed regularly.
Possible use cases include hosting AI services with sensitive data, fulfilling regulatory prescriptions, and launching projects that require an attested contour, as well as participating in government tenders.
Related articles
Ideco NGFW Novum Earns Highest Customer Rating in Quadrant Technologies Import Substitution Study
Ideco NGFW Novum achieved the top customer score of 6.9 out of 10 in the Matrix of Import Substitution 2026: NGFW research conducted by Quadrant Technologies, surpassing the market average of 6.3 and outperforming seven competing Russian solutions. The study evaluated vendors based on specialized revenue alongside 18 criteria covering product quality and functionality, with ratings provided directly by specialists who deploy and operate the firewalls in production environments. Ideco excelled in 11 parameters above seven points, including administration convenience at 7.9, technical support and partner network at 7.6, Zero Trust segmentation at 7.3, and both integration capabilities and core NGFW functionality at 7.2. Despite strong product scores, Ideco remains in the Development quadrant rather than Leadership due to lower profile revenue volume, positioning the company as a prime candidate for advancement with increased sales and large-scale deployments. Complementary testing by Infosystems Jet laboratory showed Ideco NGFW Novum passing 189 of 242 checks under Methodology 3.0 and becoming the sole participant to complete an eight-hour stress test. The broader Russian NGFW market is shifting away from emergency import substitution toward demands for real-world stability, updates, documentation, support, and usability, with product cost cited as a rejection factor by 37.5 percent of respondents.
Kubernetes Audit Policy Review: Checklist Targets Common Blind Spots in Rules
An experienced Kubernetes administrator shared a detailed review process for audit policies that often remain untouched for years after initial deployment. The 580-line policy was rebuilt using the Kubernetes Threat Matrix from RedGuard as the primary reference. The author highlights recurring issues such as outdated exceptions, missing coverage for new components, and legacy comments that obscure actual security intent. The resulting checklist focuses on principles rather than cluster-specific findings to help other teams perform effective policy audits. Key recommendations address rule completeness, exception management, and periodic full-scale reviews instead of incremental patching. The approach aims to restore audit policies as active security controls rather than accumulated technical debt.
Avoiding a Leaky Kubernetes Audit Policy: Real-World Configuration Breakdown
Kubernetes Audit Policy is typically configured once during cluster setup and then left untouched for years while accumulating exceptions for new components. Over time the policy stops functioning as a security control and instead becomes an archaeological layer of outdated comments such as "# temporary, TODO remove" that date back three years or more. The author recently reviewed their own 580-line configuration file that had been assembled from multiple sources. Primary reference was the Kubernetes Threat Matrix, which explains why many rules are designed to detect security-relevant actions rather than simply reduce log noise. Examples include targeted monitoring of RBAC modifications and deletion of events. The article emphasizes the need for periodic full reviews instead of incremental patching to maintain effective detection coverage.
CryptoPro Develops CryptoPro-Browser with Russian Cryptography for FSB Compliance
CryptoPro is creating its own browser called CryptoPro-Browser as part of the CryptoPro CSP 6.0 cryptographic information protection system. The product will include built-in cryptographic tools, support for the company's plugin, and TLS connections using Russian cryptographic algorithms. The development follows Google's removal of the CryptoPro extension from the Chrome Web Store in February 2025, which left new users without an easy installation method. The project has been coordinated with the FSB of Russia and targets scenarios requiring compliance with Russian information security regulations. CryptoPro plans to incorporate experience from its earlier Chromium-Gost project started in 2017, while also recommending Yandex Browser as an alternative. Analysts estimate the development cost at several tens of millions of rubles, with the main focus on corporate customers needing certificate management and specialized support.