安全客•August 10, 2026•🇨🇳Translated from Chinese

1755 Bitcoin Worth $110 Million Stolen from 5000 Hardware Cold Wallets Due to Flawed Random Number Generator

A mainstream hardware cold wallet suffered a systemic defect in its random number generation algorithm, allowing attackers to compromise approximately 5000 wallets and steal 1755 BTC valued at around $110 million (7.43 billion RMB). The incident, confirmed on August 4, marks the largest hardware wallet security breach in crypto history because the flaw existed at the foundational level of private key generation rather than in network defenses.

Victims had relied on the common assumption that offline cold storage provides ultimate protection, yet the non-random RNG reduced the effective keyspace dramatically, enabling feasible brute-force attacks. Historical precedents show similar RNG weaknesses have repeatedly undermined wallet security across platforms including Android implementations and various hardware chips.

The event underscores that cold storage security depends entirely on correct implementation of cryptographic primitives at every layer, from hardware entropy sources to firmware. Experts recommend avoiding blind trust in any single device, verifying third-party audits, and diversifying storage across multiple solutions including open-source options.

Event Details

The breach did not involve sophisticated network intrusions or social engineering. Instead, the wallets generated private keys from a predictable subset of possible random numbers, turning an astronomically large theoretical space into a searchable range. Attackers who identified the bias pattern could target that limited space efficiently.

Root Cause Analysis

Hardware wallets are designed to generate and store private keys offline. Private key creation relies on a cryptographically secure random number generator (RNG). When the RNG contains systematic bias, generated keys cluster in a much smaller subspace, making exhaustive search practical. This is not a new class of issue; similar RNG failures have appeared in Android Bitcoin wallets in 2013, side-channel attacks on keycard chips in 2020, and firmware-level RNG problems reported in 2023.

Recommendations

  • Do not treat the “cold storage” label as a guarantee of security; demand publicly available third-party audit reports before purchase.
  • Distribute assets across multiple devices and seed phrases so that compromise of one wallet does not result in total loss.
  • Prefer open-source hardware wallet solutions where the community can independently review the RNG implementation and entropy collection mechanisms.

Related articles

Habr•Crypto & Financial Crime

Lazarus Group Behind Record $6.3 Billion Binance Hot Wallet Theft: Anatomy and Cassandra Index Impact

Binance reported on October 29, 2026, that attackers stole approximately $6.3 billion in digital assets from its hot wallets, surpassing the previous record of $1.5 billion taken from Bybit in February 2025. The FBI attributed the breach to the TraderTraitor group, widely identified as the North Korean Lazarus Group, which has a history of high-profile operations including the 2014 Sony Pictures attack. The stolen tokens are being converted to Ethereum and laundered through decentralized finance platforms and instant exchangers. Binance covered 90 percent of losses using its SAFU fund, futures insurance reserves, and corporate treasury totaling around $6.34 billion, though this represents replacement of assets rather than recovery from the attackers. Blockchain analysis by TRM Labs linked the operation to prior campaigns against Bybit and KelpDAO through timing patterns and preparatory withdrawals via Tornado Cash. The incident contributed 2.3 percentage points to the Cassandra Index rise to 72, with the largest regional impact observed in East Asia.

BoletimSec•Crypto & Financial Crime

Binance Confirms Record $6.3 Billion Crypto Theft via Compromised Hot Wallet and EIP-7702

Binance reported on October 30, 2026 that attackers stole approximately 6.3 billion dollars in cryptocurrency, equivalent to roughly 34 billion reais, marking the largest theft in the sector. The unauthorized transfers occurred on October 29 and were completed in about 20 minutes after the attacker compromised the system authorizing withdrawals. According to TRM Labs, the intruder leveraged Ethereum's EIP-7702 feature to seize control of a hot wallet following at least 36 hours of preparation. Initial reports pointed to a compromised DevOps engineer's laptop as the entry point, but the exchange later stated the incident involved multiple factors and was not a single-click action. Roughly 3 billion dollars have been traced, with Tether freezing over 1.57 billion USDT and Circle blocking more than 800 million USDC. Binance has committed to covering all losses through its SAFU fund and internal capital while cooperating with the FBI and U.S. Secret Service. Attribution remains disputed, with TRM Labs and Chainalysis linking the operation to the TraderTraitor group connected to Lazarus, though Binance has not confirmed the perpetrators.

Securitylab•Crypto & Financial Crime

EIP-7702 Explained: How Ethereum's New Signature Standard Enables Persistent Wallet Delegation Attacks

EIP-7702, activated in May 2025 as part of the Pectra upgrade, allows Externally Owned Accounts to delegate execution to smart contract code while retaining their original address and private key. The mechanism introduces powerful features such as batch operations, gas sponsorship, and limited permissions, but also creates new attack surfaces when users sign malicious delegations. Attackers exploit social engineering to obtain EIP-7702 authorizations that install sweeper contracts capable of draining ETH, ERC-20 tokens, and NFTs without further signatures. Unlike ERC-20 approvals, the delegation persists on-chain until explicitly revoked and can affect future incoming funds across multiple networks when chain_id is set to zero. Research from 2026 identified over 900 malicious delegated accounts linked to more than $2.3 million in confirmed losses. The standard itself is not inherently vulnerable; risk stems from unsafe contract implementations and user errors when signing authorizations. Users are advised to verify delegations via Etherscan or eth_getCode and revoke them through trusted wallet interfaces when necessary.

Habr•Crypto & Financial Crime

Binance Ethereum Hot Wallets Drained of Over $5.5 Billion via EIP-7702 Delegation Attack

On October 29, attackers drained between $2.5 and $3.5 billion in ETH and tokens from Binance hot wallets on Ethereum within 40 minutes, with the total including Bitcoin and Tron reaching at least $5.57 billion according to Decrypt. The attacker did not steal private keys directly but instead used EIP-7702 to delegate execution code from a malicious contract to Binance 14, allowing a single sweep call to transfer all assets. Tether and Circle froze roughly $2.5 billion in USDT and USDC within the first hours, while Binance stated user funds remain secure and investigations continue. Blockchain analysis reveals 18 hours of preparation including three test runs on external wallets funded via Tornado Cash, followed by the main delegation and sweep in just over three minutes. The attack shares strong operational similarities with previous incidents attributed to TraderTraitor, a Lazarus subgroup, including gas funding patterns, test sweeps, and the use of a sweep function. ETH was moved first to an address that has not yet dispersed funds, while stablecoins were fragmented across new wallets before partial freezes took effect.