Adam Shostack Presents PHANTOM-B Threat Modeling Framework for LLMs at Black Hat USA
Security researcher Adam Shostack delivered a detailed presentation titled Threat Modeling LLMs: The PHANTOM-B Approach at Black Hat USA earlier this week. The talk built on recent discussions about the ease of compromising AI agents and introduced a focused framework designed specifically for threat modeling large language models.
Shostack began by clarifying the meaning of threat modeling, describing it as a systematic method for anticipating problems that applies equally to custom software, third-party components, and models downloaded from Hugging Face. He emphasized the enduring Four Question Framework that underpins the discipline: what are we working on, what can go wrong, what are we going to do about it, and did we do a good job.
The presentation highlighted why threat modeling has become critical amid the current AI race. Business pressure to release features quickly creates conditions where rushed deployments overlook systemic risks. Shostack noted that the four core questions remain stable regardless of whether the target is traditional software or an LLM pipeline.
Existing resources such as Berryville ML/LLM risk analyses, OWASP Top 10 for LLMs, MITRE ATLAS, the NIST AI/ML catalog, and Google SAIF provide valuable catalogs yet impose high training costs and often duplicate findings already covered by STRIDE. These limitations prompted the creation of PHANTOM-B, a lightweight complement rather than another exhaustive list.
PHANTOM-B identifies eight key threats: prompt injection that seizes control of LLM logic, hallucination, anthropomorphization that leads users to treat token generators as moral agents, non-explainability of model errors, training issues in data and processes, overreliance on outputs, missing security engineering in architecture, and bias. The framework deliberately excludes items already addressed by classical security engineering so teams can apply it alongside existing STRIDE, kill-chain, and SDL processes.
Distributed under a Creative Commons license, PHANTOM-B is designed to fit on a standard wallet card and has been validated on internal projects, hyperscale environments, and deployments at large financial institutions. Shostack stressed that the methodology enables rapid development without operating blindly, thereby reducing the risk of reputational damage from AI-related failures.
Related articles
TenetBench Benchmark Tests LLMs for Compliance with Professional Ethical Codes
Researchers from the Institute of Information Security Issues at ISP RAS and the Institute of Cybersecurity and Information Protection at RANEPA have developed TenetBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate how well large language models adhere to specific norms in professional codes of ethics. The benchmark generates realistic work-related prompts that may conflict with rules from documents such as the Code of Professional Ethics for Advocates or journalistic standards on undisclosed advertising. Each test case pairs a conflicting request with a neutral counterpart to measure whether models refuse, warn, or still provide prohibited content. Evaluation separates task completion, norm violation detection, and presence of explicit refusals using an LLM-as-a-Judge approach validated against human annotators. The full dataset contains 3,433 prompt pairs derived from 15 professional codes, with a public subset of 2,235 pairs from 10 documents. Human validation confirmed 99.5% of generated examples as fully plausible work scenarios.
Solar to Showcase Solar AI Firewall for Business Protection Against AI Risks at SOC Forum 2026
GK Solar will present its new Solar AI Firewall solution at SOC Forum 2026 to help organizations control interactions with AI services and prevent confidential data leaks through employee prompts. The product addresses growing risks from staff sending corporate data to neural networks and AI agents gaining access to internal systems. The forum takes place on 27-28 October in Moscow's Lomonosov cluster, with the official launch of Solar AI Firewall scheduled during the event. Solar will also highlight practical risks of AI adoption, including data transmission to external services, use of public models by employees, and new attack surfaces in corporate infrastructure. The solution will be demonstrated as part of an integrated ecosystem for access, network, and data protection. In addition, the company plans to introduce JSOC ONE, a new line of Solar JSOC services tailored for mid-sized businesses that require 24/7 monitoring without building their own SOC.
Researcher Runs 100 Abliterated AI Agents Against His Own Accounts, Achieves Five Successful Breaches
A security researcher deployed roughly 100 autonomous AI agents based on abliterated open-source models to attempt unauthorized access to his online accounts over a five-hour period. The agents successfully compromised three accounts by exploiting vulnerabilities in legacy personal projects and two additional accounts through password reuse and credential stuffing. They also conducted 16 social engineering attempts, harvested and cross-verified personal data from public sources, and generated phishing pages targeting the researcher's Substack and Hacker News presence. Despite these successes, the agents failed to discover any zero-day vulnerabilities in third-party software or gain access to Tier-0 accounts such as Gmail, 1Password, or banking services. The experiment relied on abliterated versions of GLM-5.3 and DeepSeek V4 Flash models running on cloud GPUs, orchestrated via Codex CLI inside Docker containers with access to Railway infrastructure. Total compute cost reached approximately $210, equating to roughly $40 per successful account compromise. The researcher concluded that inexpensive swarms of such agents could soon enable low-skill attackers to systematically map and exploit an individual's entire online footprint.
How Censorship in Closed AI Models Reshapes Science: Hugging Face Releases Open Carbon-X DNA Model
Hugging Face CEO Clement Delangue announced the release of Carbon-X, an open 14.8 billion parameter language model designed for reading, analyzing, and generating DNA sequences. The announcement highlighted how shallow guardrails in closed commercial models blocked even proofreading a tweet discussing the topic. Commenters and researchers pointed out that these input/output filters lack context awareness, blocking legitimate scientific queries while motivated adversaries bypass them through rephrasing. Carbon-X was built on Qwen3-14B with a hybrid BPE and 6-mer tokenizer, domain mid-training on 302 billion tokens, and safety achieved through data curation rather than runtime censorship. The model achieves performance comparable to closed frontier systems at roughly 1/1800th the inference cost for large-scale genomic tasks. The case underscores growing asymmetry between closed corporate AI labs building wet labs and independent researchers restricted by superficial safety layers.