Habr•July 27, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

Neural Networks Without Magic: 80-Year History, Business Applications, and Why They Will Not Replace Experts Overnight

Vasily Ryazanov, candidate of physical and mathematical sciences and head of the Data Science team at Twinby, sat down with journalist Alexander Shulepov to separate hype from practical value in neural networks. The conversation covers the technology’s long history, how contemporary language models operate, real business deployments, and the persistent need for human expertise.

From family history to Data Science: why neural networks entered his life long before ChatGPT

Ryazanov explains that his path began in the 1970s when his father worked on artificial intelligence and pattern recognition under academician Zhuravlev at the Academy of Sciences after finishing graduate studies around 1977. Early networks processed tables of only hundreds or thousands of rows on computers that ran for hours. By the 2000s the workflow had become clearer: load tabular data, train an algorithm, and obtain results, often written in C++.

He stresses that neural networks are not 10–20 years old but approximately 80 years old. Interest has risen and fallen in waves, with renewed attention around 2014–2015 driven by advances in image recognition, face detection, and projects such as Google DeepDream.

How TikTok became a professional platform

Ryazanov began posting on TikTok in 2019. Initial experiments with monowheel videos and song translations did not stick; a friend’s suggestion to discuss remote work and Data Science produced his first successful clip. The platform’s recommendation engine, which analyzes watch time, likes, on-screen content, speech, and music, quickly matched his material with an interested audience.

Skills and education required

For engineers and data scientists, Ryazanov insists on a solid foundation in probability theory, linear algebra, statistics, programming, and data handling. Entrepreneurs and marketers need only a clear understanding of capabilities, limitations, and data-handling rules. His own education at MIPT remains essential because much of his current work involves code and model training rather than simple prompting.

Distinguishing artificial intelligence, neural networks, and ChatGPT

Artificial intelligence is the broad goal of automating tasks associated with human thinking. Neural networks are one mathematical approach inspired by biological neurons. ChatGPT is a conversational system built on the Generative Pre-trained Transformer architecture; it predicts the next token while respecting dialogue history, safety constraints, and other controls.

Training begins with enormous datasets and GPU clusters to create a base model, followed by domain-specific fine-tuning or connection to corporate data. The cost of training frontier-scale models is dominated by GPUs, electricity, cooling, and infrastructure.

Prompts, Claude, and paid tiers

A prompt is simply a textual instruction that may assign a role, state goals, specify output format, and supply source material. Ryazanov prefers natural conversation with models, often dictating thoughts via keyboard while walking. He uses Claude most frequently because it maintains long context well and produces precise phrasing; ChatGPT remains useful for its multimodal features. Paid plans mainly remove rate limits and provide priority access during peak load.

Hallucinations, confidentiality, and the “AI psychologist” trap

Common beginner mistakes include uploading sensitive documents and placing excessive trust in fluent answers. Models can invent films, misattribute works, or cite nonexistent papers. Ryazanov warns against sending passports, medical records, trade secrets, or proprietary code to external services. When the cost of error is high—in health, finance, law, or safety—every output must be verified against primary sources and domain experts.

Although models can help structure reflections or prepare questions for a therapist or physician, they are not substitutes for professional care. The convenience of receiving a personalized summary in minutes makes the interface psychologically compelling, increasing the risk of over-reliance.

Related articles

Habr•Other

Yandex Black October: How Architectural Flaws and Capacity Mismanagement Turned Data Center Losses Into a 11-Day Fintech Coma

In October 2026 three Yandex data centers in Central Russia were physically destroyed within days, triggering the collapse of Yandex Cloud and multiple core services. Between the first and third site failures engineers had 74 hours to restore quorum and rebalance workloads yet failed to do so because Control Plane components remained tied to the lost zone and spare capacity had been eliminated to cut costs. Core banking and BNPL systems entered Read-Only mode after losing quorum, forcing a complete stop-the-world reconciliation that lasted until 22 October. Backups stored inside the same regional S3 buckets proved unusable, resulting in a seven-day RPO and primary-key collisions after restoration. The incident exposed that Metro-Cluster designs had been incorrectly treated as full Disaster Recovery and that aggressive AP microservice patterns created logical split-brain conditions outside the database layer.

AntiMalware•Other

Astra Group Releases Low-Code Astra AI Platform for Building Corporate AI Agents in Closed Environments

Astra Group has launched the Astra AI Platform, a low-code constructor designed for creating corporate AI applications that operate entirely within closed circuits without reliance on foreign clouds. The platform targets small and medium businesses as well as large corporations, enabling rapid deployment of AI secretaries, technical support assistants, and other agents in days rather than months. It forms part of the broader Astra AI ecosystem and includes two main constructors: one for machine learning model training and deployment, and another for LLM-based language assistants, document search, and process automation. Users can assemble scenarios from visual blocks, debug them in real time, or extend functionality with custom Python code when needed. The solution supports RAG-based knowledge bases, integration with external tools such as CRM and ERP systems, and the coordination of multiple agents for distributed task handling. One demonstrated use case involves processing ten pages of engineering drawings and specifications in five minutes to prepare data for downstream systems. The product is already listed in the Russian domestic software registry and available to customers.

Habr•Other

Multi-Tenancy Isolation in VictoriaMetrics, VictoriaLogs and Grafana: Building Client Separation in a Shared Stack

Voltir runs a single shared monitoring stack consisting of VictoriaMetrics, VictoriaLogs, Grafana and vmalert for all customers instead of deploying separate instances per tenant. Isolation relies on numeric account IDs enforced at every layer: nginx validates tokens against the platform API before proxying writes, Grafana data sources hard-code tenant accounts, and vmalert rules receive automatic account filters. The team discovered that a single malformed rule or template could break alerting for every tenant because vmalert loads the entire rules directory at once. They also found that Grafana automatically created personal organizations granting Org Admin rights, accumulating hundreds of orphaned organizations and users that consumed disk space and resources. A dedicated cleanup module plus hourly reconciliation now removes rules, organizations, series and users when a tenant is deleted, while isolation tests verify both data and API objects across tenants.

AntiMalware•Other

The Real Costs of Using Claude and GPT for Russian Businesses Exposed

Accessing generative AI models like Claude and GPT has become straightforward for Russian companies, yet calculating their true expenses remains complex. Hidden factors such as intermediary commissions, currency conversion rates, taxes, and the often-overlooked costs of model reasoning tokens can double or triple initial estimates. Founder Vitaly Nagay of the Heli service analyzed these financial and organizational risks for Russian firms relying on foreign AI providers. In one example, a support department processing 20,000 monthly queries sees costs rise from $240 to $480 when reasoning tokens are included. Nagay recommends evaluating providers by dividing actual ruble charges by the model's official dollar pricing to reveal hidden markups. Additional concerns involve data control, document compliance, and access history when employees use personal subscriptions. Companies are advised to verify billing details, data storage policies, and issue dedicated API keys with spending limits before procurement.