Habr•July 27, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

Local LLM Deployment for SOC: How Many Incidents Can One NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Handle?

In the second part of their experiment, analysts from R-Vision evaluated how a locally deployed large language model performs under realistic SOC workloads rather than isolated laboratory benchmarks. The configuration remained consistent with Part 1: the Qwen3.5-122B-A10B-GPTQ model served by vLLM on an NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q GPU equipped with 96 GB of video memory.

The team shifted focus from measuring raw concurrency and generation speed to simulating actual Security Operations Center operations. Real anonymized incidents from their internal SOC were used instead of synthetic test cases. The model handled five core tasks: ranking open incidents by priority, summarizing key events and assets, searching for similar recent incidents, performing retrospective searches across deeper history, and generating preliminary verdicts based on prior steps.

Two distinct load profiles were tested. In a calm shift scenario, 3–5 L1/L2 analysts managed a steady flow of 10–15 incidents per hour. Background SOAR orchestration typically processed one or two incidents concurrently, generating up to six parallel requests during the data-collection phase. Interactive analyst chats added another two to three concurrent sessions, keeping overall concurrency between 8 and 12 requests.

Under peak conditions, such as a mass phishing campaign, 5–7 analysts faced 50–100 incidents arriving rapidly. When all 16 sequences were allocated to the background pipeline, up to four incidents could be processed simultaneously on the first phase (12 requests). With five sequences reserved for interactive work, three incidents could run in parallel. A full enrichment cycle of approximately 60 seconds allowed the queue of 50 incidents to be cleared in roughly 15–20 minutes.

To prevent interactive sessions from starving background tasks, an AI Gateway layer was introduced. It separated traffic into two pools: a high-priority “Interactive” pool limited to five concurrent requests with context up to 120k tokens, and a lower-priority “Background SOAR” pool supporting up to 11 concurrent requests with shorter contexts. The gateway also enforced context-length limits and dynamic prioritization to protect KV-cache capacity.

The experiment confirmed that one RTX PRO 6000 can sustain a background throughput of five incidents per minute, equating to 300 incidents per hour or 7,200 per day, when processing typical 10k–20k token incidents. The Mixture-of-Experts architecture of Qwen3.5-122B-A10B delivered effective intelligence close to a 122B model while maintaining generation speeds comparable to a 10B model, and disabling the thinking mode further improved responsiveness without sacrificing verdict quality for SOC tasks.

Related articles

Habr•AI Security

TenetBench Benchmark Tests LLMs for Compliance with Professional Ethical Codes

Researchers from the Institute of Information Security Issues at ISP RAS and the Institute of Cybersecurity and Information Protection at RANEPA have developed TenetBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate how well large language models adhere to specific norms in professional codes of ethics. The benchmark generates realistic work-related prompts that may conflict with rules from documents such as the Code of Professional Ethics for Advocates or journalistic standards on undisclosed advertising. Each test case pairs a conflicting request with a neutral counterpart to measure whether models refuse, warn, or still provide prohibited content. Evaluation separates task completion, norm violation detection, and presence of explicit refusals using an LLM-as-a-Judge approach validated against human annotators. The full dataset contains 3,433 prompt pairs derived from 15 professional codes, with a public subset of 2,235 pairs from 10 documents. Human validation confirmed 99.5% of generated examples as fully plausible work scenarios.

AntiMalware•AI Security

Solar to Showcase Solar AI Firewall for Business Protection Against AI Risks at SOC Forum 2026

GK Solar will present its new Solar AI Firewall solution at SOC Forum 2026 to help organizations control interactions with AI services and prevent confidential data leaks through employee prompts. The product addresses growing risks from staff sending corporate data to neural networks and AI agents gaining access to internal systems. The forum takes place on 27-28 October in Moscow's Lomonosov cluster, with the official launch of Solar AI Firewall scheduled during the event. Solar will also highlight practical risks of AI adoption, including data transmission to external services, use of public models by employees, and new attack surfaces in corporate infrastructure. The solution will be demonstrated as part of an integrated ecosystem for access, network, and data protection. In addition, the company plans to introduce JSOC ONE, a new line of Solar JSOC services tailored for mid-sized businesses that require 24/7 monitoring without building their own SOC.

Habr•AI Security

Researcher Runs 100 Abliterated AI Agents Against His Own Accounts, Achieves Five Successful Breaches

A security researcher deployed roughly 100 autonomous AI agents based on abliterated open-source models to attempt unauthorized access to his online accounts over a five-hour period. The agents successfully compromised three accounts by exploiting vulnerabilities in legacy personal projects and two additional accounts through password reuse and credential stuffing. They also conducted 16 social engineering attempts, harvested and cross-verified personal data from public sources, and generated phishing pages targeting the researcher's Substack and Hacker News presence. Despite these successes, the agents failed to discover any zero-day vulnerabilities in third-party software or gain access to Tier-0 accounts such as Gmail, 1Password, or banking services. The experiment relied on abliterated versions of GLM-5.3 and DeepSeek V4 Flash models running on cloud GPUs, orchestrated via Codex CLI inside Docker containers with access to Railway infrastructure. Total compute cost reached approximately $210, equating to roughly $40 per successful account compromise. The researcher concluded that inexpensive swarms of such agents could soon enable low-skill attackers to systematically map and exploit an individual's entire online footprint.

Habr•AI Security

How Censorship in Closed AI Models Reshapes Science: Hugging Face Releases Open Carbon-X DNA Model

Hugging Face CEO Clement Delangue announced the release of Carbon-X, an open 14.8 billion parameter language model designed for reading, analyzing, and generating DNA sequences. The announcement highlighted how shallow guardrails in closed commercial models blocked even proofreading a tweet discussing the topic. Commenters and researchers pointed out that these input/output filters lack context awareness, blocking legitimate scientific queries while motivated adversaries bypass them through rephrasing. Carbon-X was built on Qwen3-14B with a hybrid BPE and 6-mer tokenizer, domain mid-training on 302 billion tokens, and safety achieved through data curation rather than runtime censorship. The model achieves performance comparable to closed frontier systems at roughly 1/1800th the inference cost for large-scale genomic tasks. The case underscores growing asymmetry between closed corporate AI labs building wet labs and independent researchers restricted by superficial safety layers.