Microsoft Tightens Corporate Windows Activation with TPM-Bound KMS Servers
Microsoft has decided to tighten controls in its corporate Windows activation system, prompting some media outlets to declare the end of pirated Windows 11. In reality, the hunt for home users has not begun: the new requirement will only affect organizations that maintain their own KMS servers.
KMS allows companies to activate computers inside their network through a single server without sending each machine directly to Microsoft. The problem is that attackers have learned to create fake and cloned KMS hosts that distribute licenses to devices for which no one has paid.
The new KMS Hardware-Secured technology will bind such a server to TPM. The chip must confirm the hardware identity to Microsoft and prove that the platform has not been modified after registration. If the check fails, activation of the corporate fleet will be blocked.
In August 2026, Windows Server 2025 will begin displaying warnings about readiness for the new requirements. They will become mandatory with the release of the next LTSC version of Windows Server, whose date has not yet been announced. Until then, existing KMS systems will continue to work as usual.
Administrators of physical servers can already check support for TPM attestation using the command Get-TpmSupportedFeature -FeatureList "Key Attestation". For virtual KMS hosts, Microsoft is still preparing separate recommendations.
The innovation is not directly related to pirated copies of Windows on home PCs. It does not check the user computer and does not affect popular illegal activation methods that do not rely on corporate KMS servers. Even the KMS38 method closed in November 2025 was a different story: it faked the activation period through a system file and had nothing to do with TPM or real KMS infrastructure.
Thus, Microsoft is indeed strengthening license protection, but so far only where Windows is activated in bulk. Home pirates can breathe easy, while corporate administrators should check their TPM support.
Related articles
Protecting Data Centers from Kinetic and Cyber Attacks: What Regulators Worldwide Are Proposing
InfoWatch experts have updated their April report on data center resilience, highlighting how physical and cyber threats now directly threaten business continuity and national security. Regulators in the United States, European Union, and Russia are treating data centers as strategic infrastructure requiring layered defenses that combine physical hardening, geographic distribution, and strict cybersecurity controls. The United States has launched the Cyberstrategy for America 2026 emphasizing offensive operations, Zero Trust modernization, and supply-chain restrictions. The European Union is implementing ProtectEU and the Cyber Solidarity Act with real-time threat sharing and mandatory resilience standards under DORA. Russia is advancing technological sovereignty targets, new siting rules for data centers, and Presidential Decree No. 604 that enables temporary state management of inadequately protected critical facilities. The report also notes growing recognition that attacks on data centers can constitute acts of aggression under the Tallinn Manual.
US Department of Homeland Security Orders Federal Agencies to Remove DeepSeek Products
The US Department of Homeland Security issued an order on October 19 requiring federal civilian agencies to cease purchasing products from DeepSeek and to remove related technology from government systems. The directive, published the following day, targets Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence, its affiliates, and any third-party products or services built on DeepSeek implementations. The measure stems from the Federal Acquisition Supply Chain Security Act of 2018 and follows a recommendation by the Federal Acquisition Security Council, though no specific incidents or evidence were detailed in the notice. The restriction applies only to federal environments and does not prohibit private sector or individual use outside government systems. No removal deadline was set, and the document does not name the signing authority. The order is filed under docket DHS-2026-0628 with the CISA implementation team listed as the contact point.
AKIT Requests Temporary Permission for Russian Companies to Transfer Personal Data Abroad After Data Center Incidents
The Association of Internet Trade Companies (AKIT) has sent a formal letter to Russian Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin proposing a temporary exemption from strict data localization rules. The measure would allow affected companies to move critical systems and Russian citizens' personal data to data centers in friendly countries when domestic infrastructure is unavailable due to accidents or damage. Members including Ozon, Wildberries, Cooper, and Yandex Market argue that services must continue operating even if Russian facilities are compromised. The proposed special regime would apply only after an officially confirmed incident, require compliance with information security standards, and end no later than March 1, 2028. After recovery, companies would be required to return to normal data processing within Russia. Expert Alexey Muntyan noted that the mechanism activates only after incidents occur and questioned whether countries should be selected based on data protection levels rather than political alignment.
Anthropic Model Reconstructs NSA Seeds for NIST Elliptic Curves in Under 30 Minutes
An internal Anthropic research model traced the origins of the five seeds used by the NSA to generate the NIST elliptic curves P-192, P-224, P-256, P-384, and P-521. The discovery resolves a 25-year-old question that arose when the curves were standardized in FIPS 186-2 for ECDSA in 2000. Researchers combined analysis of 1990s random number generators, 34 generator-output combinations, and lattice reduction techniques to identify lrand48 initialized with Unix timestamps from May 1997 to April 1998. The P-256 seed corresponds to the 1842nd candidate from a run started on 16 August 1997, and example seeds from ANSI X9.62 follow the same pattern. The work does not demonstrate any cryptographic break or backdoor in the curves and does not recommend changes to production systems. Several questions remain open, including the seed for curve B-163 and the reason certain candidate values were discarded.