AntiMalwareJuly 24, 2026🇷🇺Translated from Russian

EU Imposes 21st Sanctions Package Targeting 94 Russian Banks Including Ozon Bank, Yandex Bank and WB Bank

The European Union has approved its 21st sanctions package against Russia, imposing restrictions on 94 banks, the Moscow Exchange, and multiple payment organizations.

Effective 23 July, the measures target Rosselkhozbank, Dom.rf, MTS Bank, Ak Bars, Uralsib, Zenit, Absolut Bank, WB Bank, Ozon Bank, Tochka, Yandex Bank, Post Bank, and other institutions. The list also includes the non-profit organization Mobile Card and the settlement non-bank credit organization Payment Center.

Personal sanctions were applied to Bank of Russia Deputy Chairman Sergey Belov, Russian Railways CEO Oleg Belozerov, and additional individuals. Beyond the financial sector, the package addresses energy, trade, and cryptocurrency activities.

The Moscow Exchange stated that trading and settlements will proceed without changes. Ozon Bank, Tochka, and broker Finam (not included in the sanctions) assured clients that services and payments continue in normal mode.

AFK Sistema described the EU decision as unlawful and pledged to manage the restrictions. Initial operational impacts have already emerged: the Golden Crown payment system halted transfers to Georgia and several other countries after support confirmed that certain routes are temporarily unavailable.

Another potential consequence is the removal of banking applications from App Store and Google Play, following previous precedent with sanctioned Russian banks and VK. Owners of affected banks are advised to retain currently installed applications.

The Russian mission to the EU warned of an adequate response to the new measures.

Related articles

HabrPolicy & Regulation

Bank of Russia Publishes Methodological Recommendations No. 3-MR on AI Security for Financial Market Participants

The Bank of Russia has released methodological recommendations No. 3-MR dated 16 June 2026, providing detailed guidance on ensuring information security during the development and use of artificial intelligence systems in the financial sector. The document builds on the earlier Code of Ethics for AI in finance and integrates with existing risk management, operational resilience, and data protection frameworks already familiar to credit institutions and other market participants. It introduces standardized terminology for AI-specific threats such as hallucinations, data drift, and poisoned datasets while outlining six risk categories and a four-stage AI system lifecycle model. Organizations are advised to apply threat modeling based on FSTEC methodology, implement proportional controls across data preparation, development, training, and operation phases, and maintain human oversight for high-risk automated processes. Special attention is given to supply chain risks involving third-party vendors and open-source components, requiring due diligence, provenance tracking, and contractual safeguards aligned with existing outsourcing standards. The recommendations remain non-binding yet signal clear regulatory expectations that are likely to influence future compliance checks and audits.

AntiMalwarePolicy & Regulation

Aladdin Obtains New FSB Certificate for CryptoFlash Encrypted USB Drive Valid Until 2029

Aladdin has received a new FSB Russia certificate for its Aladdin CryptoFlash hardware-encrypted USB drive. The certificate number СФ/124-5574 confirms compliance with cryptographic protection requirements for classes KS1 and KS2 and remains valid until 16 July 2029. The device now supports additional Russian Linux distributions including RED OS 7.3 and 8, Alt 8 SP Workstation, Alt Workstation 10, and the OS of the Moscow Electronic School. Read and write speeds have been increased to 11 MB/s while the graphical interface received improvements. The product uses the Magma encryption algorithm in hardware and operates as a clientless solution that requires no additional drivers or software. The previous certificate remains active until December 2028, allowing both versions of the device to be used in parallel for storing and transferring official and confidential information marked DSP.

AntiMalwarePolicy & Regulation

Microsoft Tightens Corporate Windows Activation with TPM-Bound KMS Servers

Microsoft is strengthening its corporate Windows licensing controls by introducing new requirements for KMS servers used in volume activation. The changes will bind KMS hosts to TPM hardware attestation, preventing cloned or fake servers from issuing licenses to unlicensed devices. Warnings will begin appearing in Windows Server 2025 in August 2026, with mandatory enforcement planned for the next LTSC release. Existing KMS systems will continue operating normally until the new rules take effect. The update targets enterprise environments with on-premises KMS infrastructure and does not affect individual consumer devices or common non-KMS activation bypass methods. Administrators can already verify TPM support on physical servers using the Get-TpmSupportedFeature command.

HabrPolicy & Regulation

Russia's Article 10.1 on Personal Data Dissemination: Apparent and Real Contradictions in Federal Law 152-FZ

Part II of the analysis examines how the rushed redrafting of Article 10.1 between the first and second readings created serious interpretive problems in Federal Law 152-FZ. The core issues include undefined terms such as 'disclosure', conflicting definitions of 'access', 'provision' and 'dissemination' between 152-FZ and 149-FZ, and the removal of the legal basis for processing publicly available data while retaining the consent mechanism that was meant to control it. Courts have consistently held that mere openness of data does not constitute a valid processing ground, forcing subsequent operators to find their own basis under Article 6. The article highlights that the mechanism for subjects to set conditions and prohibitions was preserved, yet the underlying legal foundation that would make those rules effective was eliminated. Two possible readings of the special consent are explored, with judicial practice leaning toward the narrower interpretation that leaves conditions and prohibitions as mere additional restrictions rather than a source of authorization.