Thales Group Report Reveals Surge in AI Agent Adoption and Rising Cybersecurity Budgets Worldwide
Thales Group has released a comprehensive report examining how artificial intelligence is reshaping information security practices around the globe. The study, based on responses from more than 3,000 participants in 20 countries, highlights both the opportunities and the mounting risks created by widespread AI adoption.
According to the findings, 34 percent of organizations are already using AI agents in their operations, while 73 percent intend to implement them within the coming year. The introduction of these autonomous agents has accelerated data processing speeds and volumes, making it significantly harder for security teams to maintain adequate protection levels.
As a direct consequence, the number of companies earmarking dedicated budgets for AI-related security has grown by 50 percent year-over-year. Last year only 20 percent of respondents allocated specific funds for AI security; this year the figure has risen to 30 percent. Nevertheless, 53 percent still cover AI protection costs from their general information-security budgets.
Speed of change within AI ecosystems was cited by 70 percent of respondents as a major security challenge. Additionally, 61 percent confirmed that their AI applications had become direct targets of attacks aimed at exfiltrating sensitive information. New forms of reputational harm are also emerging: 48 percent of organizations reported financial losses caused by AI-generated disinformation, and 59 percent encountered deepfake-based attacks.
Among realized AI-driven attacks, those focused on disclosing confidential data showed the strongest growth. Cloud resources continue to dominate attacker priorities, with cloud storage named by 35 percent, SaaS applications by 34 percent, and cloud management infrastructure by 32 percent of respondents. User credentials have climbed from eighth to fifth place among top targets, cited by 21 percent, while identity data moved from tenth to sixth place.
Regular security audits demonstrate clear benefits. More than half of organizations that conduct routine audits reported no data leaks from cloud services (54 percent) or corporate systems (57 percent). In contrast, only 6 percent of companies that skipped audits could claim the same. Human error remains the leading cause of incidents, accounting for 28 percent of breaches.
Russian companies share concerns about public AI services
The InfoWatch expert center also presented results from a survey conducted by the Russian BISA association among domestic information-security and IT specialists. Respondents identified the transfer of confidential data to public AI services as the primary threat vector (89 percent), followed by risks associated with embedded AI agents and unintended disclosure to third parties (both 59 percent).
Almost half (46 percent) of Russian respondents said they had either experienced or were aware of data leaks involving generative AI tools. While 59 percent acknowledged the value of AI in daily workflows, they stressed the need for better regulation, methods to detect AI-generated text, and mechanisms to recall data from public models. Most organizations currently allow limited use of AI tools (46 percent) and rely on employee training (48 percent) and enhanced monitoring (30 percent) to mitigate risks.
Related articles
TenetBench Benchmark Tests LLMs for Compliance with Professional Ethical Codes
Researchers from the Institute of Information Security Issues at ISP RAS and the Institute of Cybersecurity and Information Protection at RANEPA have developed TenetBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate how well large language models adhere to specific norms in professional codes of ethics. The benchmark generates realistic work-related prompts that may conflict with rules from documents such as the Code of Professional Ethics for Advocates or journalistic standards on undisclosed advertising. Each test case pairs a conflicting request with a neutral counterpart to measure whether models refuse, warn, or still provide prohibited content. Evaluation separates task completion, norm violation detection, and presence of explicit refusals using an LLM-as-a-Judge approach validated against human annotators. The full dataset contains 3,433 prompt pairs derived from 15 professional codes, with a public subset of 2,235 pairs from 10 documents. Human validation confirmed 99.5% of generated examples as fully plausible work scenarios.
Solar to Showcase Solar AI Firewall for Business Protection Against AI Risks at SOC Forum 2026
GK Solar will present its new Solar AI Firewall solution at SOC Forum 2026 to help organizations control interactions with AI services and prevent confidential data leaks through employee prompts. The product addresses growing risks from staff sending corporate data to neural networks and AI agents gaining access to internal systems. The forum takes place on 27-28 October in Moscow's Lomonosov cluster, with the official launch of Solar AI Firewall scheduled during the event. Solar will also highlight practical risks of AI adoption, including data transmission to external services, use of public models by employees, and new attack surfaces in corporate infrastructure. The solution will be demonstrated as part of an integrated ecosystem for access, network, and data protection. In addition, the company plans to introduce JSOC ONE, a new line of Solar JSOC services tailored for mid-sized businesses that require 24/7 monitoring without building their own SOC.
Researcher Runs 100 Abliterated AI Agents Against His Own Accounts, Achieves Five Successful Breaches
A security researcher deployed roughly 100 autonomous AI agents based on abliterated open-source models to attempt unauthorized access to his online accounts over a five-hour period. The agents successfully compromised three accounts by exploiting vulnerabilities in legacy personal projects and two additional accounts through password reuse and credential stuffing. They also conducted 16 social engineering attempts, harvested and cross-verified personal data from public sources, and generated phishing pages targeting the researcher's Substack and Hacker News presence. Despite these successes, the agents failed to discover any zero-day vulnerabilities in third-party software or gain access to Tier-0 accounts such as Gmail, 1Password, or banking services. The experiment relied on abliterated versions of GLM-5.3 and DeepSeek V4 Flash models running on cloud GPUs, orchestrated via Codex CLI inside Docker containers with access to Railway infrastructure. Total compute cost reached approximately $210, equating to roughly $40 per successful account compromise. The researcher concluded that inexpensive swarms of such agents could soon enable low-skill attackers to systematically map and exploit an individual's entire online footprint.
How Censorship in Closed AI Models Reshapes Science: Hugging Face Releases Open Carbon-X DNA Model
Hugging Face CEO Clement Delangue announced the release of Carbon-X, an open 14.8 billion parameter language model designed for reading, analyzing, and generating DNA sequences. The announcement highlighted how shallow guardrails in closed commercial models blocked even proofreading a tweet discussing the topic. Commenters and researchers pointed out that these input/output filters lack context awareness, blocking legitimate scientific queries while motivated adversaries bypass them through rephrasing. Carbon-X was built on Qwen3-14B with a hybrid BPE and 6-mer tokenizer, domain mid-training on 302 billion tokens, and safety achieved through data curation rather than runtime censorship. The model achieves performance comparable to closed frontier systems at roughly 1/1800th the inference cost for large-scale genomic tasks. The case underscores growing asymmetry between closed corporate AI labs building wet labs and independent researchers restricted by superficial safety layers.