US Prepares for Free Chinese AI Models Distributed Like Torrents, Weighs Policy Shift on Open-Source Systems
The Trump administration is preparing for the emergence of powerful Chinese AI models that any user will be able to download for free from the internet, similar to torrent distribution. This scenario is prompting Washington to reconsider existing rules governing American open-source AI systems.
Officials are currently consulting with industry representatives to establish unified capability requirements for such models. Chinese systems already available in open form are being used as the reference point. American developers may be permitted to release models of comparable performance, while more advanced developments would likely face additional restrictions.
Companies anticipate that Chinese models in the Mythos class will become publicly available within the next 6–12 months. Users will then be able to run these systems on their own hardware, modify them, and embed them into other applications without any control from the original developer.
For the United States this creates a difficult policy challenge. Harsh prohibitions could slow domestic companies without stopping the spread of foreign technologies. China is already actively developing open neural networks and distributing them freely to strengthen the international position of its developers. Some Chinese systems have gained rapid popularity after restrictions were placed on American models, largely because they remain accessible and cost less.
Simultaneously, technology companies are seeking ways to reduce electricity consumption in data centers. These facilities currently account for approximately 1.5% of global electricity usage, and the International Energy Agency expects demand to continue rising quickly.
The Washington Post observes that long-term forecasts may prove overstated. Companies are testing superconducting cables capable of transmitting more energy with lower losses, as well as optical connections that move data using light instead of electrical signals. These technologies could significantly cut the energy required to transfer information between computing devices.
Because the new solutions have not yet been deployed at scale, real-world savings remain difficult to quantify. Nevertheless, progress in superconductors and optical systems indicates that growth in computing power will not necessarily produce an equally sharp increase in electricity consumption.
Related articles
Bank of Russia Publishes Methodological Recommendations No. 3-MR on AI Security for Financial Market Participants
The Bank of Russia has released methodological recommendations No. 3-MR dated 16 June 2026, providing detailed guidance on ensuring information security during the development and use of artificial intelligence systems in the financial sector. The document builds on the earlier Code of Ethics for AI in finance and integrates with existing risk management, operational resilience, and data protection frameworks already familiar to credit institutions and other market participants. It introduces standardized terminology for AI-specific threats such as hallucinations, data drift, and poisoned datasets while outlining six risk categories and a four-stage AI system lifecycle model. Organizations are advised to apply threat modeling based on FSTEC methodology, implement proportional controls across data preparation, development, training, and operation phases, and maintain human oversight for high-risk automated processes. Special attention is given to supply chain risks involving third-party vendors and open-source components, requiring due diligence, provenance tracking, and contractual safeguards aligned with existing outsourcing standards. The recommendations remain non-binding yet signal clear regulatory expectations that are likely to influence future compliance checks and audits.
Aladdin Obtains New FSB Certificate for CryptoFlash Encrypted USB Drive Valid Until 2029
Aladdin has received a new FSB Russia certificate for its Aladdin CryptoFlash hardware-encrypted USB drive. The certificate number СФ/124-5574 confirms compliance with cryptographic protection requirements for classes KS1 and KS2 and remains valid until 16 July 2029. The device now supports additional Russian Linux distributions including RED OS 7.3 and 8, Alt 8 SP Workstation, Alt Workstation 10, and the OS of the Moscow Electronic School. Read and write speeds have been increased to 11 MB/s while the graphical interface received improvements. The product uses the Magma encryption algorithm in hardware and operates as a clientless solution that requires no additional drivers or software. The previous certificate remains active until December 2028, allowing both versions of the device to be used in parallel for storing and transferring official and confidential information marked DSP.
Microsoft Tightens Corporate Windows Activation with TPM-Bound KMS Servers
Microsoft is strengthening its corporate Windows licensing controls by introducing new requirements for KMS servers used in volume activation. The changes will bind KMS hosts to TPM hardware attestation, preventing cloned or fake servers from issuing licenses to unlicensed devices. Warnings will begin appearing in Windows Server 2025 in August 2026, with mandatory enforcement planned for the next LTSC release. Existing KMS systems will continue operating normally until the new rules take effect. The update targets enterprise environments with on-premises KMS infrastructure and does not affect individual consumer devices or common non-KMS activation bypass methods. Administrators can already verify TPM support on physical servers using the Get-TpmSupportedFeature command.
Russia's Article 10.1 on Personal Data Dissemination: Apparent and Real Contradictions in Federal Law 152-FZ
Part II of the analysis examines how the rushed redrafting of Article 10.1 between the first and second readings created serious interpretive problems in Federal Law 152-FZ. The core issues include undefined terms such as 'disclosure', conflicting definitions of 'access', 'provision' and 'dissemination' between 152-FZ and 149-FZ, and the removal of the legal basis for processing publicly available data while retaining the consent mechanism that was meant to control it. Courts have consistently held that mere openness of data does not constitute a valid processing ground, forcing subsequent operators to find their own basis under Article 6. The article highlights that the mechanism for subjects to set conditions and prohibitions was preserved, yet the underlying legal foundation that would make those rules effective was eliminated. Two possible readings of the special consent are explored, with judicial practice leaning toward the narrower interpretation that leaves conditions and prohibitions as mere additional restrictions rather than a source of authorization.