Securitylab•October 28, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

Top 10 Secure DNS Servers for Privacy, Threat Blocking and Ad Filtering in 2026

Google’s 8.8.8.8 and Cloudflare’s 1.1.1.1 are familiar even to users who have never configured networks, yet popularity does not guarantee superior protection against fraud, advertising blocking, or careful handling of personal data. The standard Cloudflare 1.1.1.1 performs no malicious-site filtering, although many assume it offers full protection.

Modern DNS services vary widely. Quad9 specialises in blocking dangerous domains. AdGuard DNS targets advertising and tracking. NextDNS lets users define per-device rules. Mullvad emphasises confidentiality, while the European DNS4EU offers multiple protection tiers and processes queries inside EU infrastructure.

What Makes DNS Secure and Why Encryption Alone Is Not Enough

DNS translates names such as example.com into IP addresses. Traditional queries travel unencrypted over port 53, allowing network operators or attackers to observe or tamper with responses. Protected services use several complementary technologies.

  • DNS over HTTPS (DoH) sends queries inside encrypted HTTPS connections, typically on port 443.
  • DNS over TLS (DoT) protects traffic with TLS, usually on port 853.
  • DNSSEC validates the authenticity of signed DNS records but does not encrypt queries.
  • Threat protection blocks domains listed as phishing, malware infrastructure or command-and-control servers.
  • Advertising filtering blocks known ad and tracking domains.

Even a correctly signed DNSSEC record can point to a fraudulent site, and DoH hides queries from local observers while still allowing the DNS provider to see domain names. Users should therefore evaluate four criteria: threat-filtering effectiveness, data-handling policies, encryption support and real-world stability.

Comparison of Ten Secure DNS Services

All listed services support DoH and DoT. The table below shows primary IPv4 addresses and intended use.

  • Quad9 – 9.9.9.9 – Phishing and malware domains – Everyday security
  • Cloudflare – 1.1.1.2 – Threat blocking in security mode – General use
  • AdGuard DNS – 94.140.14.14 – Ads, tracking and dangerous domains – Home, phones, TVs
  • NextDNS – Personal configuration – Custom lists and policies – Flexible control
  • Control D – 76.76.2.1 – Selectable filter categories – Ready-made profiles
  • CleanBrowsing – 185.228.168.168 – Family protection and phishing – Households and children’s devices
  • Mullvad DNS – 194.242.2.4* – Encryption, filters and privacy – Confidentiality
  • DNS4EU – 86.54.11.1 – Threats and additional filters – European users
  • Google Public DNS – 8.8.8.8 – DNSSEC, no standard filtering – Compatibility and diagnostics
  • DNS.SB – 185.222.222.222 – DNSSEC and encrypted DNS – Alternative non-filtering resolver

*Mullvad’s address works only via DoH or DoT.

Quad9 – Protection Without Extra Configuration

Quad9, a Swiss non-profit, blocks known phishing, malware and command-and-control domains using threat intelligence from multiple sources. It does not log end-user IP addresses, requires no registration, supports encryption and DNSSEC on all profiles since June 2026. It does not filter advertising or adult content.

Cloudflare – Multiple Protection Levels

Cloudflare offers three public resolvers: 1.1.1.1 (no filtering), 1.1.1.2 (threat blocking) and 1.1.1.3 (family mode). The service provides wide availability and published privacy commitments but remains a large US company.

AdGuard DNS – Advertising and Tracking Blocking

AdGuard DNS blocks ad and tracking domains on computers, phones and smart TVs while also limiting malware and phishing. YouTube ads served from the same infrastructure as video content usually remain visible.

NextDNS – Personalised Rules

NextDNS lets users create separate configurations per network or device, choose blocklists, set category restrictions and manage query logs. The free tier allows 300 000 queries monthly before disabling personal filtering.

Additional Services and Recommendations

Control D supplies free public profiles for different filter sets without requiring an account. CleanBrowsing focuses on family filtering with safe-search enforcement. Mullvad DNS accepts queries only over encrypted protocols and maintains a strict no-logs policy. DNS4EU processes requests inside the EU and applies court-ordered blocks even in its unfiltered profile. Google Public DNS and DNS.SB serve as reliable non-filtering options for diagnostics and compatibility testing.

Practical Selection and Configuration

For a home computer, Quad9 or Cloudflare 1.1.1.2 provide straightforward threat protection. AdGuard DNS reduces advertising across devices. Families should consider CleanBrowsing. Users needing custom rules can use NextDNS or Control D. Privacy-focused individuals may prefer Mullvad DNS, while European residents can choose DNS4EU.

Simple IP changes do not guarantee encryption. Windows 11, Android’s Private DNS feature, iOS profiles and router DHCP settings must be configured for DoH or DoT. After changes, verify the active resolver with nslookup or online DNS test tools and confirm that IPv6 or VPN settings do not bypass the chosen service.

Related articles

Habr•Privacy & Surveillance

Personal AI Assistants Build Detailed Profiles on Friends and Family Raising Privacy Concerns

New generation AI agents such as Muse from Meta and Dots from OpenAI are gaining extensive access to user data including emails, messengers, and financial accounts. These agents operate with broad permissions to perform actions on behalf of users while automatically collecting personal information. Security researchers discovered that Muse creates detailed profiles on every person in a user's life including family members, partners, friends, and colleagues. The profiles include sections on facts, history, relationships, and strategies for strengthening connections using real evidence only. Data collection occurs through hourly background processes and nightly dream-like analysis that stores information in Markdown files and PostgreSQL databases. The architecture includes isolated VMs designed by Moxie Marlinspike to prevent swarm formation among agents but does not address third-party data exposure. This development expands existing social graphs maintained by major technology companies through previous generations of web services.

Securitylab•Privacy & Surveillance

VPN vs Proxy: Technical Comparison of Data Protection Technologies

VPN and proxy servers are frequently viewed as interchangeable tools for routing internet traffic and masking IP addresses, yet their core mechanisms diverge sharply after the initial redirection step. VPN technology establishes an encrypted tunnel between the device and a remote server, protecting data from local network observers, while proxies primarily forward connections without inherent encryption. The article examines differences in encryption, traffic scope, anonymity limitations, performance impacts, and appropriate use cases for each technology. It also highlights risks associated with free services, including the 911 S5 criminal proxy network that compromised millions of devices. Detailed breakdowns cover HTTP, HTTPS, and SOCKS5 proxies, split tunneling in VPNs, DNS leakage risks, and configuration best practices for Windows 11, macOS, Firefox, and Chrome. The comparison concludes that selection depends on specific tasks rather than one technology being universally superior.

Securitylab•Privacy & Surveillance

Maximizing iPhone Privacy: Essential Settings to Enable, Disable, and Verify Immediately

The article provides a detailed guide on strengthening iPhone privacy by limiting unauthorized access to messages, location data, photos, and cloud backups. It explains how to set a strong alphanumeric passcode, enable Stolen Device Protection, and restrict lock screen notifications and widgets. Users are advised to review Apple ID security, enable Advanced Data Protection for iCloud, and minimize app permissions for location, contacts, and camera. Additional steps include turning off cross-app tracking, using private Wi-Fi addresses, and activating Lockdown Mode for high-risk scenarios. The guide emphasizes regular updates, encrypted local backups, and periodic audits of shared access and active sessions to maintain long-term protection.

Habr•Privacy & Surveillance

WebRTC IP Leaks Explained: Why Disabling the Protocol Harms Anonymity in Anti-Detect Browsers

The article from Aurorium details how WebRTC technology can leak real IP addresses even when users route traffic through proxies. It explains the peer-to-peer mechanics of WebRTC, the role of STUN servers in generating ICE candidates, and why standard TCP proxies fail to handle UDP traffic. Disabling WebRTC via flags or JavaScript extensions creates detectable anomalies that anti-fraud systems flag as non-standard environments. The recommended approach involves native emulation inside the browser kernel so that STUN requests return proxy IPs while preserving full API integrity across workers. Additional leaks through local network addresses, mDNS candidates, and IPv6 are also covered with practical verification methods using tools like BrowserLeaks and CreepJS.