Curator Reveals Detailed Architecture of Its Network Filtering System After October 2026 Outage
On October 8, 2026, Curator experienced its first major outage in a decade when its entire traffic filtering network became unavailable for 38 minutes. The incident coincided with a separate physical attack on a Yandex data center in Sasovo, though the two events appear unrelated. In its official post-mortem, Curator provided an in-depth look at the architecture of its distributed filtering platform, covering traffic paths, BGP routing, VRF segmentation, and centralized configuration management.
Curator currently maintains nine filtering sites in Russia. Each site consists of multiple filtering nodes connected through high-performance switches to upstream operators. Every node communicates with the switch using two logically separated routing contexts: VRF external and VRF internal. Separate BGP sessions run in each context to exchange routing information.
Unfiltered traffic arrives via VRF external, is processed by the node, and returns cleaned through VRF internal. This separation guarantees that traffic passes through the protection layer in sequence before reaching its destination. The switches also maintain BGP sessions with upstream providers and BGP-connected customers, while all devices connect to an OOB router for independent management access.
Each filtering node runs a custom firewall developed internally by Curator. The firewall operates directly in the Linux kernel and uses proprietary rule syntax optimized for extremely high traffic volumes. Rules are treated as critical configuration because an error can affect not only user traffic but also the routing and monitoring protocols that keep the filtering system itself operational.
A watchdog process on every node continuously checks the health of BGP sessions between the node and the switch. Loss of a monitored session causes the watchdog to remove the node from rotation. While effective for isolating individual failures, this mechanism can cascade if the same condition appears simultaneously across all nodes.
Configuration changes are distributed by the CControl system, which pushes both customer-specific protection parameters and infrastructure settings to all nodes. Centralization eliminates manual per-node updates but creates the risk that a single incorrect change can impact the entire fleet at once.
The outage highlighted the delicate balance required in high-scale filtering networks: performance and rapid configuration must be weighed against the potential for widespread impact when centralized mechanisms fail. Curator stressed the importance of component isolation, staged rollouts, and independent recovery paths to limit the blast radius of future incidents.
Related articles
Building Your First Home Network Lab: Essential Tools and Experiments to Understand Corporate Networks
A cybersecurity professional without network knowledge resembles a guard without a building blueprint, spotting alarms but unable to trace the intruder. Setting up a personal lab on a standard computer bridges this gap through virtualization and hands-on practice with protocols and attacks. The guide recommends GNS3 for topology emulation, VirtualBox or VMware for running Windows and Linux workstations, Cisco Packet Tracer for quick simulations, Wireshark for traffic analysis, and draw.io for diagramming. Key experiments include configuring Cisco IOS routers with IP addressing, testing default gateways, observing ARP requests and replies, triggering broadcast storms via switch loops, and enabling STP to prevent loops. The lab demonstrates how legacy protocols like ARP expose networks to spoofing and why segmentation with VLANs and firewalls matters. Resources from CyberED provide demo access to courses on SOC analysis, penetration testing, and AI applications in security to extend learning.
PSLC and Agent-Ops: From Product Support to Infrastructure Transformation
Sergey Zhitinsky, founder of Git in Sky, attended the OPS Talk by Sber meetup on October 19 and discussed the PSLC methodology with architect Alexander Shapovalov. PSLC, or Product Service Lifecycle, outlines two loops for restoring services immediately and improving reliability to prevent recurrence through teams, knowledge, and platform support. Agent-Ops focuses on eight detailed steps for individual infrastructure tasks: intention, evidence collection, diagnostics, planning, approval, controlled change, verification, and lessons learned. The article illustrates their complementary use in a scenario where post-release log growth fills a database disk, requiring both service restoration and root-cause fixes. Both approaches emphasize knowledge retention, action control, and human accountability, though Agent-Ops v0.5.1 mandates explicit human approval and separate execution for production changes. PSLC suits larger organizations with shared platforms, while Agent-Ops targets smaller teams handling infrastructure operations with AI agents.
Russian Organizations Allocate 4.5 Trillion Rubles to Innovation Spending in 2025
Large and medium-sized Russian organizations directed a total of 4.5 trillion rubles toward innovation activities during 2025. Nearly half of the expenditure originated from the services sector, while information technology and telecommunications accounted for 860.9 billion rubles. The Institute for Statistical Studies and Economics of Knowledge at HSE University published the figures based on Rosstat data, showing an innovation intensity rate of 2.7 percent. Services companies alone contributed approximately 2.3 trillion rubles, including 882.7 billion rubles for research and development. Astra Group IR Director Vladislav Anshakov outlined major spending areas such as product development, cloud and AI hardware, and acquisitions of technologies and teams. The group expanded its portfolio with the Perseus DBMS and a 26 percent stake in AI developer AIB. More than one-third of organizations cited high costs and insufficient internal funds as key barriers to further innovation.
Telegram macOS Developer Says 99.9% of Client Code Is Now Written by AI and Suggests Firing Manual Coders
Mike, the developer of the official Telegram client for macOS, stated that artificial intelligence now generates 99.9 percent of the messenger's client code. He argued that programmers who continue writing code manually should be dismissed. In a Telegram discussion, Mike cited the gram.org website as an example created entirely with AI assistance in a single day, with domain support from Pavel Durov. He also described adapting the iOS client for a foldable iPhone Duo overnight using Claude. According to Mike, even designers are now contributing to client code, and 80 to 90 percent of Telegram developers share his positive view of AI tools. When participants raised questions about code quality and security, Mike replied that AI also identifies and fixes vulnerabilities, claiming the resulting code is superior to human-written equivalents. He further announced plans to open a new GitHub repository for the macOS client source code, as the previous repository had not been updated for over a year.