Habr•September 13, 2026•🇷🇺Translated from Russian

Deepfakes Turn Job Interviews into Cyberattack Vectors Targeting IT Candidates and Recruiters

Job interviews have become a growing attack vector as threat actors deploy deepfakes and malicious code disguised as test assignments to target both candidates and recruiters in the IT sector.

Attackers first gain trust by posing as company representatives, then ask applicants to review or fix code in repositories on GitHub, GitLab, or Bitbucket. Infection occurs through compromised npm packages or Visual Studio Code extensions that install backdoors capable of capturing cryptographic keys, passwords, screenshots, and clipboard contents.

Historically, state-linked groups such as Lazarus sent fake job offers to chemical and IT companies that delivered trojans. A specialized collective named Contagious Interview now focuses exclusively on this tactic.

One documented case involved a Python developer from the Smello project who received an offer from a crypto startup. The test task required cloning a repository and running npm install; analysis revealed a prepare script that would have loaded a backdoor connecting to an attacker-controlled server.

Recruiters also face risks when sophisticated deepfakes allow unqualified or malicious individuals to impersonate candidates during video calls. Gartner forecasts that by 2028 every fourth interviewee could be fake, raising concerns beyond poor hiring decisions to include industrial espionage and data breaches.

Security researcher David Mochadlo described two convincing deepfake interviews within a single month; visual artifacts and an unexpected accent ultimately revealed the deception. Companies such as Socure flag indicators including newly created email addresses and unverifiable education claims.

Defensive measures for candidates include running all test code exclusively inside virtual machines and manually inspecting repository contents before execution. Organizations are advised to verify candidate profiles, train staff to spot desynchronization between audio and video, and apply interview protocols such as the GOTCHA movement challenges developed at New York University, which detect deepfakes in nearly 89 percent of cases.

Additional academic methods include eye-gaze pattern analysis from Clarkson University and corneal reflection of geometric probe patterns tested at the University at Buffalo. Microsoft and other vendors recommend these layered approaches because deepfake technology continues to advance rapidly, as noted by Unit 42.

In response, firms including Cisco, McKinsey, and Google have reintroduced in-person interviews to reduce reliance on remote verification that deepfakes can compromise.

Related articles

Habr•AI Security

Taming the LLM Dragon: Corporate AI Gateway Architecture Addresses Classic Proxy Shortcomings

Spontaneous adoption of generative AI across enterprises has created shadow AI risks, prompt leaks, and uncontrolled token consumption that standard L7 proxies cannot mitigate. Traditional solutions built on Nginx, Envoy or Kong lack the ability to inspect Server-Sent Events streams, classify sensitive content inside prompts, or enforce token-based quotas in real time. The AI Optimum platform introduces a specialized AI gateway layer that sits between internal consumers and both local inference clusters and external APIs such as GigaChat and YandexGPT. It performs inline PII masking, routes traffic according to data sensitivity, supports OpenAI-compatible endpoints, and maintains detailed audit logs required under 152-FZ. The gateway adds only tens of milliseconds of latency while enabling granular billing, context caching optimization, and protection against runaway agent loops. Subsequent articles in the series will examine real corporate AI spend and further regulatory controls.

Habr•AI Security

Why We Banned Our AI Manager from Writing Code and Assigned the Task to Claude Opus

The team behind an AI-powered marketplace manager for Wildberries initially built the system using regular updates, then migrated it to an autonomous agent. After implementing multiple layers of restrictions, they ultimately removed the agent entirely and rebuilt the solution from scratch. The new architecture relies on a single tool that handles the complete Wildberries API along with internet access while respecting all platform limits. The decision to prohibit the original AI manager from generating code stemmed from concerns over reliability and security in production environments. Instead, the developers turned to Claude Opus to handle coding tasks. This case highlights practical challenges of deploying AI agents in e-commerce automation and information security contexts.

Habr•AI Security

Developer Builds MCP Linter and Discovers Security Issues in Anthropic Official Servers

A developer has released mcp-linter, a lightweight security and compliance tool for the Model Context Protocol used by Anthropic's Claude ecosystem. The linter detects critical problems such as stdout pollution that breaks JSON-RPC framing, missing destructiveHint annotations that allow autonomous agents to execute dangerous actions without human confirmation, prompt injection vectors hidden inside tool descriptions, and incomplete input schemas that increase model hallucinations. When run against Anthropic's reference servers, the tool assigned low health scores to server-memory and especially server-filesystem, highlighting dozens of parameters lacking descriptions. The utility runs with zero dependencies, supports SARIF output for GitHub Security, and can generate automatic JSON patches. The project is open source under MIT license and already integrates into CI pipelines via a dedicated GitHub Action.

Habr•AI Security

Pentesting AI Components: Key Vulnerabilities CISOs Must Address in RAG and AI Agents

The article examines how AI integration into corporate systems dramatically expands the attack surface beyond traditional web application testing. It details risks associated with chatbots, RAG-enabled systems that pull from internal documents, and autonomous AI agents capable of executing real actions via APIs. Yuri Grishaev, an OSCP+ certified specialist and top Standoff 365 hacker, explains how prompt injection can bypass access controls and lead to data leaks or unauthorized operations. The piece stresses that service accounts often hold broad privileges, allowing AI components to serve as indirect paths to sensitive data even when direct user access is restricted. It also covers how AI-generated output can trigger classic vulnerabilities such as XSS if not properly sanitized. Recommendations include inventorying all AI tools, enforcing least-privilege principles, and validating user permissions before any model processes or acts on retrieved content. ABP2B provides free checklists and policy templates to help organizations prepare for secure AI adoption.